Blessed are the poor in judgement for theirs is the…
I was dubious about Kingdom of Heaven from the start but then I read some reviews that suggested it might have more going for it than I imagined - some insights into the Christian/Muslim conflict, for example, or failing that, an entertaining storyline. I should have stuck with my initial instincts.
This film is a mess. It’s film-making by numbers. The plot is on auto-pilot with no sense of craft and no idea of pace or character development. The characters are barely sketched - the writer assumes the audience will fill in the blanks and I suppose it’s not difficult for us since we’ve seen it all before. The dialogue is mostly exposition and - as seems to be increasingly the case with these Hollywood epics - the script owes less to the historical events it purports to portray and more to the myth of the American dream of the self-made man, the primacy of the individual, and self-help book philosophy: You can be whatever you want to be if you believe in it strong enough. And the good guy always gets the girl in the end.
I found the whole thing very tedious and at over two-and-a-half hours, just too long. The two young lads in front of me were sleeping like babies after half an hour despite being tanked-up on super-sized cokes and popcorn. The most entertaining part of the movie for me was the inquisitive child behind me who kept pestering his mother with questions: “Why is the king wearing a mask?” “Because he is a leper. Keep quiet. People are trying to watch the film.” “How is the king a leopard?”
I give it 1 star for the performances of Jeremy Irons, Brendan Gleeson and Dave Thewlis who managed to make something out of their roles with very little help from the script. As usual Treasa disagrees with me but she’s in good company.
Mark Waters marked time at 9:31 am on May 9th, 2005 .

Have you seen this one then?
http://film.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/Critic_Review/Guardian_Film_of_the_week/0,4267,1477002,00.html
- not sure how you react to html tags, so just the bare link - sorry.
For insight into history, I tend to rely on books. I actually remember reading a very good one on this subject from the library about a year ago but for the life of me I can’t remember the name of the author and a brief look through amazon threw up something like 790 books, mostly called “Crusades”, “The Crusades”, “Crusade” or “Crusaders” or any of the above with “And the XXX” or vice versa. I might go and see if they still have it, now that I don’t have evening lectures any more. I might have time to read more books.